Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

The author have met his objections to an extent but not completely. There should be clear documentation of the experimental evidence of deviations from the Arrhenius equation. The methods used for evaluating J should be given in the paper. The polarimeter cannot explain away variations in the final velocity constants given in the table.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1940].

Reference number
RR/67/296
Earliest possible date
17 June 1940
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Ronald Percy Bell

View page for Ronald Percy Bell

Use this record

Citation

Ronald Percy Bell, Second referee's report by Ronald Percy Bell, on a paper 'The kinetics of mutarotation in solution' by E A Moelwyn-Hughes and John Cowdery Kendrew, 17 June 1940, RR/67/296, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_67_296/second-referees-report-by-ronald-percy-bell-on-a-paper-the-kinetics-of-mutarotation-in-solution-by-e-a-moelwyn-hughes-and-john-cowdery-kendrew, accessed on 13 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_67_296/second-referees-report-by-ronald-percy-bell-on-a-paper-the-kinetics-of-mutarotation-in-solution-by-e-a-moelwyn-hughes-and-john-cowdery-kendrew" title="Second referee's report by Ronald Percy Bell, on a paper 'The kinetics of mutarotation in solution' by E A Moelwyn-Hughes and John Cowdery Kendrew" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection