Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. The conclusion is important and the arguments leading to it are 'bold and ingenious', though open to objection. He is not convinced by the list of content at the beginning of the paper, as it doesn't aid in reading the paper.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 13 March 1939.

Reference number
RR/67/261
Earliest possible date
March 1939
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Francis John Worsley Roughton

View page for Francis John Worsley Roughton

Use this record

Citation

Francis John Worsley Roughton, Referee's report by Francis John Worsley Roughton, on a paper 'Cytochrome and cytochrome oxidase' by David Keilin and E F Hartree, March 1939, RR/67/261, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_67_261/referees-report-by-francis-john-worsley-roughton-on-a-paper-cytochrome-and-cytochrome-oxidase-by-david-keilin-and-e-f-hartree, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_67_261/referees-report-by-francis-john-worsley-roughton-on-a-paper-cytochrome-and-cytochrome-oxidase-by-david-keilin-and-e-f-hartree" title="Referee's report by Francis John Worsley Roughton, on a paper 'Cytochrome and cytochrome oxidase' by David Keilin and E F Hartree" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection