Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions or Proceedings. It is a 'very good' paper that is likely to provide a definitive answer to the problem of Saturn's rings. Some parts of the paper could be rearranged.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1941].

Endorsed on verso as received 31 October 1940.

Reference number
RR/67/193
Earliest possible date
October 1940
Physical description
Standardised form (type E) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Hopwood Jeans

View page for James Hopwood Jeans

Use this record

Citation

James Hopwood Jeans, Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'The theory of the divisions in Saturn's rings' by George Ridsdale Goldsbrough, October 1940, RR/67/193, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_67_193/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-the-divisions-in-saturns-rings-by-george-ridsdale-goldsbrough, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_67_193/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-the-divisions-in-saturns-rings-by-george-ridsdale-goldsbrough" title="Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'The theory of the divisions in Saturn's rings' by George Ridsdale Goldsbrough" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection