Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

He finds the new paper more interesting than the original, shorter one. The Royal Society Archives should not be burdened with the MS, as it is the author's duty to look after this. A few modifications could still made. If William Bragg and Dr Astbury are satisfied with the shorter version, then he will not object to it's publication.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1940].

Reference number
RR/67/156
Earliest possible date
01 March 1940
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

David Keilin

View page for David Keilin

Use this record

Citation

David Keilin, Letter from David Keilin, on a paper 'A study of the physical and chemical properties of the insect cuticle' by Gottfried Fraenkel and K M Rudall, 01 March 1940, RR/67/156, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_67_156/letter-from-david-keilin-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-physical-and-chemical-properties-of-the-insect-cuticle-by-gottfried-fraenkel-and-k-m-rudall, accessed on 14 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_67_156/letter-from-david-keilin-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-physical-and-chemical-properties-of-the-insect-cuticle-by-gottfried-fraenkel-and-k-m-rudall" title="Letter from David Keilin, on a paper 'A study of the physical and chemical properties of the insect cuticle' by Gottfried Fraenkel and K M Rudall" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection