Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton thinks the paper can be passed without referee. If a referee is required, suggests Max Born or William Lawrence Bragg. Richard Whiddington agrees to acceptance of the paper.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 2 November 1939.

Reference number
RR/66/82
Earliest possible date
01 November 1939
Physical description
Memoranda
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Ralph Howard Fowler

View page for Ralph Howard Fowler

Use this record

Citation

Ralph Howard Fowler, Memoranda, on a paper 'Statistical thermodynamics of super-lattices' by Ralph Howard Fowler and Edward Armand Guggenheim, 01 November 1939, RR/66/82, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_82/memoranda-on-a-paper-statistical-thermodynamics-of-super-lattices-by-ralph-howard-fowler-and-edward-armand-guggenheim, accessed on 07 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_82/memoranda-on-a-paper-statistical-thermodynamics-of-super-lattices-by-ralph-howard-fowler-and-edward-armand-guggenheim" title="Memoranda, on a paper 'Statistical thermodynamics of super-lattices' by Ralph Howard Fowler and Edward Armand Guggenheim" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection