Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Finds some of the results published by the same authors elsewhere. CSuggests further investigation should be completed before the paper is published.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on recto as received 27 June 1939.

Reference number
RR/66/52
Earliest possible date
25 June 1939
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Leonard James Spencer

View page for Leonard James Spencer

Use this record

Citation

Leonard James Spencer, Referee's report by Leonard James Spencer, on a paper 'The lamellar structure of potash-soda felspars' by S H Chao and W H Taylor, 25 June 1939, RR/66/52, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_52/referees-report-by-leonard-james-spencer-on-a-paper-the-lamellar-structure-of-potash-soda-felspars-by-s-h-chao-and-w-h-taylor, accessed on 13 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_52/referees-report-by-leonard-james-spencer-on-a-paper-the-lamellar-structure-of-potash-soda-felspars-by-s-h-chao-and-w-h-taylor" title="Referee's report by Leonard James Spencer, on a paper 'The lamellar structure of potash-soda felspars' by S H Chao and W H Taylor" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection