Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests adding legends to the figures. Has no issue with his identity being revealed to the author, as they have already discussed the paper.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on recto as received 12 December 1939.

Reference number
RR/66/24
Earliest possible date
December 1939
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Nevill Francis Mott

View page for Nevill Francis Mott

Use this record

Citation

Nevill Francis Mott, Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'Reciprocity failure of photographic materials at short exposure times' by W F Berg, December 1939, RR/66/24, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_24/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-reciprocity-failure-of-photographic-materials-at-short-exposure-times-by-w-f-berg, accessed on 12 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_24/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-reciprocity-failure-of-photographic-materials-at-short-exposure-times-by-w-f-berg" title="Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'Reciprocity failure of photographic materials at short exposure times' by W F Berg" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection