Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests a re-wording for the end of the summary. Comments on the effects observed.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on recto as received 5 January 1940.

Reference number
RR/66/238
Earliest possible date
January 1940
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Nevill Francis Mott

View page for Nevill Francis Mott

Use this record

Citation

Nevill Francis Mott, Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'The phosphorescence of various solids' by John Turton Randall and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins, January 1940, RR/66/238, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_238/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-the-phosphorescence-of-various-solids-by-john-turton-randall-and-maurice-hugh-frederick-wilkins, accessed on 16 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_238/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-the-phosphorescence-of-various-solids-by-john-turton-randall-and-maurice-hugh-frederick-wilkins" title="Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'The phosphorescence of various solids' by John Turton Randall and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection