Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton thinks the paper can be passed without referee. The Communicator Patrick Maynard Stuart Blackett, Baron Blackett of Chelsea thinks it should go through quickly, as the paper clears up many things and would 'help prevent wasted work by others'. Richard Whiddington agrees to acceptance of the paper without referee if the paper is urgent, otherwise suggests Evan James Williams.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 21 June 1939.

Reference number
RR/66/147
Earliest possible date
19 June 1939
Physical description
Memoranda
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Use this record

Citation

Memoranda, on a paper 'Shower production by penetrating cosmic rays' by Alfred Charles Bernard Lovell, 19 June 1939, RR/66/147, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_147/memoranda-on-a-paper-shower-production-by-penetrating-cosmic-rays-by-alfred-charles-bernard-lovell, accessed on 12 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_147/memoranda-on-a-paper-shower-production-by-penetrating-cosmic-rays-by-alfred-charles-bernard-lovell" title="Memoranda, on a paper 'Shower production by penetrating cosmic rays' by Alfred Charles Bernard Lovell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection