Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Not stated [Physics]

Gives thanks that the lettering can be completed at the Royal Observatory. States that the charts will have to be considerably reduced in scale.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

No received date.

Reference number
RR/66/116
Earliest possible date
16 July 1945
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Typescript

Use this record

Citation

Fifth letter from John David Griffith Davies, to Harold Spencer Jones, regarding a paper 'The Earth's magnetic field in Southern Africa at the epoch, 1 July 1930' by E N Grindley, 16 July 1945, RR/66/116, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_66_116/fifth-letter-from-john-david-griffith-davies-to-harold-spencer-jones-regarding-a-paper-the-earths-magnetic-field-in-southern-africa-at-the-epoch-1-july-1930-by-e-n-grindley, accessed on 19 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_66_116/fifth-letter-from-john-david-griffith-davies-to-harold-spencer-jones-regarding-a-paper-the-earths-magnetic-field-in-southern-africa-at-the-epoch-1-july-1930-by-e-n-grindley" title="Fifth letter from John David Griffith Davies, to Harold Spencer Jones, regarding a paper 'The Earth's magnetic field in Southern Africa at the epoch, 1 July 1930' by E N Grindley" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection