Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Not recommended for publication. It is a speculative work that should be sent elsewhere. Part one if of low quality and gives the impression of a 'rather second-rate theses'. Part two is interesting, though speculative.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 6 September 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/64
Earliest possible date
02 September 1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur John Allmand

View page for Arthur John Allmand

Use this record

Citation

Arthur John Allmand, Referee's report by Arthur John Allmand, on a paper 'The polymerisation of vinyl acetates. Parts I & II' by A C Cuthberston, G Gee and Eric Keightley Rideal, 02 September 1938, RR/65/64, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_64/referees-report-by-arthur-john-allmand-on-a-paper-the-polymerisation-of-vinyl-acetates-parts-i-ii-by-a-c-cuthberston-g-gee-and-eric-keightley-rideal, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_64/referees-report-by-arthur-john-allmand-on-a-paper-the-polymerisation-of-vinyl-acetates-parts-i-ii-by-a-c-cuthberston-g-gee-and-eric-keightley-rideal" title="Referee's report by Arthur John Allmand, on a paper 'The polymerisation of vinyl acetates. Parts I & II' by A C Cuthberston, G Gee and Eric Keightley Rideal" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection