Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. Clearer differentiations should be made between the main section and other parts. Proper captions should be added to the figures.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/236
Earliest possible date
1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edmund Clifton Stoner

View page for Edmund Clifton Stoner

Use this record

Citation

Edmund Clifton Stoner, Referee's report by Edmund Clifton Stoner, on a paper 'The magnetic properties of bismuth, III. Further measurements on the de Haas-van Alphen effect' by David Shoenberg, 1938, RR/65/236, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_236/referees-report-by-edmund-clifton-stoner-on-a-paper-the-magnetic-properties-of-bismuth-iii-further-measurements-on-the-de-haas-van-alphen-effect-by-david-shoenberg, accessed on 30 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_236/referees-report-by-edmund-clifton-stoner-on-a-paper-the-magnetic-properties-of-bismuth-iii-further-measurements-on-the-de-haas-van-alphen-effect-by-david-shoenberg" title="Referee's report by Edmund Clifton Stoner, on a paper 'The magnetic properties of bismuth, III. Further measurements on the de Haas-van Alphen effect' by David Shoenberg" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection