Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. One of the chapters should be 'drastically shortened', as it doesn't add anything relevant to the paper.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 17 November 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/223
Earliest possible date
November 1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

David Keilin

View page for David Keilin

Use this record

Citation

David Keilin, Referee's report by David Keilin, on a paper 'A reinvestigation of turacin, the copper porphyrin pigment of certain birds belonging to the musophagidae' by Claude Rimington, November 1938, RR/65/223, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_223/referees-report-by-david-keilin-on-a-paper-a-reinvestigation-of-turacin-the-copper-porphyrin-pigment-of-certain-birds-belonging-to-the-musophagidae-by-claude-rimington, accessed on 12 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_223/referees-report-by-david-keilin-on-a-paper-a-reinvestigation-of-turacin-the-copper-porphyrin-pigment-of-certain-birds-belonging-to-the-musophagidae-by-claude-rimington" title="Referee's report by David Keilin, on a paper 'A reinvestigation of turacin, the copper porphyrin pigment of certain birds belonging to the musophagidae' by Claude Rimington" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection