Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. Further experiments are needed. If the authors were in England, he would suggest sending the paper back to them to modify the doubtful points of the paper. However, they are in Australia, so the paper should be printed.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 11 October 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/175
Earliest possible date
October 1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Chadwick

View page for James Chadwick

Use this record

Citation

James Chadwick, Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'The ß-ray spectrum of Ra E' by Leslie Harold Martin and Albert Alan Townsend, October 1938, RR/65/175, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_175/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-the-ß-ray-spectrum-of-ra-e-by-leslie-harold-martin-and-albert-alan-townsend, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_175/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-the-ß-ray-spectrum-of-ra-e-by-leslie-harold-martin-and-albert-alan-townsend" title="Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'The ß-ray spectrum of Ra E' by Leslie Harold Martin and Albert Alan Townsend" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection