Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The presentation of the plates is 'extremely confusing' and should be modified. The account seems 'somewhat long and involved'. The paper should be published for the benefit of cytologists.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/174
Earliest possible date
1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E) and note on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

John Desmond Bernal

View page for John Desmond Bernal

Use this record

Citation

John Desmond Bernal, Referee's report by John Desmond Bernal, on a paper 'Evidence on spiral structure and chromosome pairing in osmunda regalis L' by Irene Manton, 1938, RR/65/174, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_174/referees-report-by-john-desmond-bernal-on-a-paper-evidence-on-spiral-structure-and-chromosome-pairing-in-osmunda-regalis-l-by-irene-manton, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_174/referees-report-by-john-desmond-bernal-on-a-paper-evidence-on-spiral-structure-and-chromosome-pairing-in-osmunda-regalis-l-by-irene-manton" title="Referee's report by John Desmond Bernal, on a paper 'Evidence on spiral structure and chromosome pairing in osmunda regalis L' by Irene Manton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection