Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper contains 'clear presentation, well documented with good technique'. The idea isn't new but it is useful to be supported by definite measurements.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1939].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 December 1938.

Reference number
RR/65/173
Earliest possible date
December 1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Reginald Ruggles Gates

View page for Reginald Ruggles Gates

Use this record

Citation

Reginald Ruggles Gates, Referee's report by Reginald Ruggles Gates, on a paper 'Evidence on spiral structure and chromosome pairing in osmunda regalis L' by Irene Manton, December 1938, RR/65/173, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_65_173/referees-report-by-reginald-ruggles-gates-on-a-paper-evidence-on-spiral-structure-and-chromosome-pairing-in-osmunda-regalis-l-by-irene-manton, accessed on 12 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_65_173/referees-report-by-reginald-ruggles-gates-on-a-paper-evidence-on-spiral-structure-and-chromosome-pairing-in-osmunda-regalis-l-by-irene-manton" title="Referee's report by Reginald Ruggles Gates, on a paper 'Evidence on spiral structure and chromosome pairing in osmunda regalis L' by Irene Manton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection