Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests some omissions and laterations for the text.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 2 December 1937.

Reference number
RR/64/2
Earliest possible date
December 1937
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Edward Briggs

View page for George Edward Briggs

Use this record

Citation

George Edward Briggs, Referee's report by George Edward Briggs, on a paper 'The effect on the growth of Lemna minor of alternating periods of light and darkness of equal length' by Hugh Dickson, December 1937, RR/64/2, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_64_2/referees-report-by-george-edward-briggs-on-a-paper-the-effect-on-the-growth-of-lemna-minor-of-alternating-periods-of-light-and-darkness-of-equal-length-by-hugh-dickson, accessed on 14 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_64_2/referees-report-by-george-edward-briggs-on-a-paper-the-effect-on-the-growth-of-lemna-minor-of-alternating-periods-of-light-and-darkness-of-equal-length-by-hugh-dickson" title="Referee's report by George Edward Briggs, on a paper 'The effect on the growth of Lemna minor of alternating periods of light and darkness of equal length' by Hugh Dickson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection