Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Finds the paper 'clumsily expressed', make some suggested revisions and modifications.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 19 January 1938.

Reference number
RR/64/130
Earliest possible date
January 1938
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Carl Frederick Abel Pantin

View page for Carl Frederick Abel Pantin

Use this record

Citation

Carl Frederick Abel Pantin, Referee's report by Carl Frederick Abel Pantin, on a paper 'The receptive mechanism of the background response in chromatic behaviour of crustacea' by H G Smith, January 1938, RR/64/130, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_64_130/referees-report-by-carl-frederick-abel-pantin-on-a-paper-the-receptive-mechanism-of-the-background-response-in-chromatic-behaviour-of-crustacea-by-h-g-smith, accessed on 05 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_64_130/referees-report-by-carl-frederick-abel-pantin-on-a-paper-the-receptive-mechanism-of-the-background-response-in-chromatic-behaviour-of-crustacea-by-h-g-smith" title="Referee's report by Carl Frederick Abel Pantin, on a paper 'The receptive mechanism of the background response in chromatic behaviour of crustacea' by H G Smith" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection