Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. It is a sound piece of work but isn't very interesting. There is no way of shortening it and there is no need for another referee.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1937].

Endorsed on verso as received 10 February 1937.

Reference number
RR/63/90
Earliest possible date
February 1937
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Galton Darwin

View page for Charles Galton Darwin

Use this record

Citation

Charles Galton Darwin, Referee's report by Charles Galton Darwin, on a paper 'The general motion of a spinning uniformly and rigidly electrifield sphere, III' by George Adolphus Schott, February 1937, RR/63/90, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_63_90/referees-report-by-charles-galton-darwin-on-a-paper-the-general-motion-of-a-spinning-uniformly-and-rigidly-electrifield-sphere-iii-by-george-adolphus-schott, accessed on 06 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_63_90/referees-report-by-charles-galton-darwin-on-a-paper-the-general-motion-of-a-spinning-uniformly-and-rigidly-electrifield-sphere-iii-by-george-adolphus-schott" title="Referee's report by Charles Galton Darwin, on a paper 'The general motion of a spinning uniformly and rigidly electrifield sphere, III' by George Adolphus Schott" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection