Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Alexander Craig Aitken, on a paper 'On bipartitional functions' by P V Sukhatme

Reference number: RR/63/106

Date: 08 May 1937

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full. There are some typography and punctuation errors that the printer should solve. It is difficult to verify if the calculations are correct, as the tables are so heavy.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1938].

Endorsed on verso as received 13 May 1937.

Reference number
RR/63/106
Earliest possible date
08 May 1937
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Alexander Craig Aitken

View page for Alexander Craig Aitken

Use this record

Citation

Alexander Craig Aitken, Referee's report by Alexander Craig Aitken, on a paper 'On bipartitional functions' by P V Sukhatme, 08 May 1937, RR/63/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_63_106/referees-report-by-alexander-craig-aitken-on-a-paper-on-bipartitional-functions-by-p-v-sukhatme, accessed on 27 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_63_106/referees-report-by-alexander-craig-aitken-on-a-paper-on-bipartitional-functions-by-p-v-sukhatme" title="Referee's report by Alexander Craig Aitken, on a paper 'On bipartitional functions' by P V Sukhatme" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection