Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The handling of the distinction between space-like and time-like elements is elegant. Refers to work of George Frederick James Temple.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 30 June 1936.

Reference number
RR/62/40
Earliest possible date
June 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Stanley Eddington

View page for Arthur Stanley Eddington

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Stanley Eddington, Referee's report by Arthur Stanley Eddington, on a paper 'Integral electromagnetic theorems in general relativity' by John Lighton Synge, June 1936, RR/62/40, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_62_40/referees-report-by-arthur-stanley-eddington-on-a-paper-integral-electromagnetic-theorems-in-general-relativity-by-john-lighton-synge, accessed on 05 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_62_40/referees-report-by-arthur-stanley-eddington-on-a-paper-integral-electromagnetic-theorems-in-general-relativity-by-john-lighton-synge" title="Referee's report by Arthur Stanley Eddington, on a paper 'Integral electromagnetic theorems in general relativity' by John Lighton Synge" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection