Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The technical nature of the journal makes it more suitable for a technical journal such as The Journal of Agricultural Science, where it is more likely to reach those to whom it would be of most interest. Makes clear this opinion of the paper in no reflects on the value of the paper.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 23 March 1936.

Reference number
RR/62/106
Earliest possible date
20 March 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Udny Yule

View page for George Udny Yule

Use this record

Citation

George Udny Yule, Referee's report by George Udny Yule, on a paper 'A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties' by Frank Yates, 20 March 1936, RR/62/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_62_106/referees-report-by-george-udny-yule-on-a-paper-a-new-method-of-arranging-variety-trials-involving-a-large-number-of-varieties-by-frank-yates, accessed on 11 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_62_106/referees-report-by-george-udny-yule-on-a-paper-a-new-method-of-arranging-variety-trials-involving-a-large-number-of-varieties-by-frank-yates" title="Referee's report by George Udny Yule, on a paper 'A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties' by Frank Yates" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection