Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Containing referees' reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review between 1866 and 1869.

Notable referees and authors include James Clerk Maxwell, Richard Owen and Arthur Cayley.

Reference number
RR/6
Earliest possible date
1866-1869
Physical description
Leather bound volume, gilded title on spine and one folder of loose papers
Page extent
316 reports
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Referees' reports: volume 6, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1866-1869, RR/6, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6/referees-reports-volume-6-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 04 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6/referees-reports-volume-6-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 6, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection