Referees' reports: volume 6, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/6
Date: 1866-1869
Description
Containing referees' reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review between 1866 and 1869.
Notable referees and authors include James Clerk Maxwell, Richard Owen and Arthur Cayley.
- Reference number
- RR/6
- Earliest possible date
- 1866-1869
- Physical description
- Leather bound volume, gilded title on spine and one folder of loose papers
- Page extent
- 316 reports
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 6, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1866-1869, RR/6, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6/referees-reports-volume-6-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 29 November 2023
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6/referees-reports-volume-6-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6/referees-reports-volume-6-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 6, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Parent Records
This item is part of:
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection