Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Refers to work by Heinrich Müller. Suggests the parts confirming the previous work of Heinrich Müller should be condensed. Suggests figures which should be included.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1866]

Reference number
RR/5/88
Earliest possible date
1864
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Sharpey

View page for William Sharpey

Use this record

Citation

William Sharpey, Referee's report by William Sharpey, on a paper 'On the chameleon's retina; a further contribution to the minute anatomy of the retina of reptiles' by John Whitaker Hulke, 1864, RR/5/88, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_88/referees-report-by-william-sharpey-on-a-paper-on-the-chameleons-retina-a-further-contribution-to-the-minute-anatomy-of-the-retina-of-reptiles-by-john-whitaker-hulke, accessed on 09 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_88/referees-report-by-william-sharpey-on-a-paper-on-the-chameleons-retina-a-further-contribution-to-the-minute-anatomy-of-the-retina-of-reptiles-by-john-whitaker-hulke" title="Referee's report by William Sharpey, on a paper 'On the chameleon's retina; a further contribution to the minute anatomy of the retina of reptiles' by John Whitaker Hulke" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection