Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1865]

Reference number
RR/5/72
Earliest possible date
25 July 1865
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Alfred Baring Garrod

View page for Alfred Baring Garrod

Use this record

Citation

Alfred Baring Garrod, Referee's report by Alfred Baring Garrod, on a paper 'On the application of physiological tests for certain organic poisons, and especially digitaline' by C Hilton Fagge and Thomas Stevenson, 25 July 1865, RR/5/72, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_72/referees-report-by-alfred-baring-garrod-on-a-paper-on-the-application-of-physiological-tests-for-certain-organic-poisons-and-especially-digitaline-by-c-hilton-fagge-and-thomas-stevenson, accessed on 08 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_72/referees-report-by-alfred-baring-garrod-on-a-paper-on-the-application-of-physiological-tests-for-certain-organic-poisons-and-especially-digitaline-by-c-hilton-fagge-and-thomas-stevenson" title="Referee's report by Alfred Baring Garrod, on a paper 'On the application of physiological tests for certain organic poisons, and especially digitaline' by C Hilton Fagge and Thomas Stevenson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection