Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.


Hesitatingly recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Would like to know if Smith [Henry John Stephen Smith?] is the other referee, and what they thought of the paper.

Subject: Mathematics

[Paper untraced - publication status unknown]

Reference number
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages

Creator name

Arthur Cayley

View page for Arthur Cayley

Use this record


Arthur Cayley, Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on an unknown paper by an unknown author, RR/5/44, The Royal Society Archives, London,, accessed on 19 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="" title="Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on an unknown paper by an unknown author" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection