Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on an unknown paper by an unknown author
Reference number: RR/5/44
Description
Hesitatingly recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Would like to know if Smith [Henry John Stephen Smith?] is the other referee, and what they thought of the paper.
Subject: Mathematics
[Paper untraced - publication status unknown]
- Reference number
- RR/5/44
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 3 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Arthur Cayley, Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on an unknown paper by an unknown author, RR/5/44, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_44/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-an-unknown-paper-by-an-unknown-author, accessed on 15 March 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_44/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-an-unknown-paper-by-an-unknown-author
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_44/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-an-unknown-paper-by-an-unknown-author" title="Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on an unknown paper by an unknown author" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 5, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1863-1865 Reference number: RR/5
Related Fellows
-
Arthur Cayley
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.
Dates: 1832 - 1954
View collection