Referee's report by Robert Edmond Grant, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank
Reference number: RR/5/26
Date: 22 July 1861
Description
Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Regrets that there was only a month available to read the paper, as they would have liked longer to enjoy it. Refers to previous paper by the same author. The author is known throughout Europe as a skilled perparator and microscopist, and has the largest collection of Porifera in Europe. Refers to work of Luigi Ferdinando Marsili, Filippo Cavolini, Johann Schweigger, Ellis [?], Johnstone [?], Carter [Henry John Carter?], Thomas Henry Huxley and Johann Nathanael Lieberkühn. Considers the paper one of the best they have ever read, and that 'no medal or honor [sic] in the gift of the Royal Society conferred on the author, could adequately express the gratitude of at least one fellow-member'.
Subject: Zoology
[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1862]
- Reference number
- RR/5/26
- Earliest possible date
- 22 July 1861
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 5 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Robert Edmond Grant, Referee's report by Robert Edmond Grant, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank, 22 July 1861, RR/5/26, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_26/referees-report-by-robert-edmond-grant-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-and-physiology-of-the-spongiadaepart-ii-by-james-scott-bowerbank, accessed on 14 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_26/referees-report-by-robert-edmond-grant-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-and-physiology-of-the-spongiadaepart-ii-by-james-scott-bowerbank
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_26/referees-report-by-robert-edmond-grant-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-and-physiology-of-the-spongiadaepart-ii-by-james-scott-bowerbank" title="Referee's report by Robert Edmond Grant, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
XXXII. On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadoe.—Part II External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 31st December 1862
DOI: 10.1098/rstl.1862.0035
Related Records
-
Second referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank
Creator: George Busk Reference number: RR/5/27 -
Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank
Creator: George Busk Reference number: RR/5/28 -
Referee's report by Henry John Carter, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank
Creator: Henry John Carter Reference number: RR/5/30 -
Referee's report by William Benjamin Carpenter, on a paper 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae.—Part II' by James Scott Bowerbank
Creator: William Benjamin Carpenter Reference number: RR/5/32 -
Paper, 'On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadœ' by J S [James Scott] Bowerbank
Creator: James Scott Bowerbank Reference number: PT/66/9 -
Paper, 'On the anatomy and physiology of the spongiadae' by J S [James Scott] Bowerbank
Creator: James Scott Bowerbank Reference number: PT/67/9
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 5, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1863-1865 Reference number: RR/5
Related Fellows
-
James Scott Bowerbank
Author -
Robert Edmond Grant
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection