Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests publication in the Proceedings, 'where a good deal of it has already printed verbatim'. Suggests a few edits to the text.

Subject: Botany, Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1864]

Reference number
RR/5/256
Earliest possible date
22 January 1864
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Allen Miller

View page for William Allen Miller

Use this record

Citation

William Allen Miller, Referee's report by William Allen Miller, on a paper 'Examination of Rubia munjista, the East-Indian madder, or munjeet of commerce' by John Stenhouse, 22 January 1864, RR/5/256, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_256/referees-report-by-william-allen-miller-on-a-paper-examination-of-rubia-munjista-the-east-indian-madder-or-munjeet-of-commerce-by-john-stenhouse, accessed on 17 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_256/referees-report-by-william-allen-miller-on-a-paper-examination-of-rubia-munjista-the-east-indian-madder-or-munjeet-of-commerce-by-john-stenhouse" title="Referee's report by William Allen Miller, on a paper 'Examination of Rubia munjista, the East-Indian madder, or munjeet of commerce' by John Stenhouse" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection