Second letter from Arthur Cayley, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Reference number: RR/5/203
Date: 4 May 1863
Description
As the paper does not now claim to have prooved Fermat's Theorem, has no objection to publication, but does not recommend publication. Has been to visit Veables [?], who is well and sends his regards.
Subject: Mathematics
[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1863]
- Reference number
- RR/5/203
- Earliest possible date
- 4 May 1863
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 3 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Arthur Cayley, Second letter from Arthur Cayley, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock, 4 May 1863, RR/5/203, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_203/second-letter-from-arthur-cayley-to-george-gabriel-stokes-regarding-a-paper-on-fermats-theorem-of-the-polygonal-numbers-second-communication-by-jonathan-frederick-pollock, accessed on 09 October 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_203/second-letter-from-arthur-cayley-to-george-gabriel-stokes-regarding-a-paper-on-fermats-theorem-of-the-polygonal-numbers-second-communication-by-jonathan-frederick-pollock
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_203/second-letter-from-arthur-cayley-to-george-gabriel-stokes-regarding-a-paper-on-fermats-theorem-of-the-polygonal-numbers-second-communication-by-jonathan-frederick-pollock" title="Second letter from Arthur Cayley, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
XXV. On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 31st December 1863
DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1862.0046
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Arthur Cayley Reference number: RR/5/189 -
Referee's report by Henry John Stephen Smith, on a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Henry John Stephen Smith Reference number: RR/5/190 -
Second referee's report by Henry John Stephen Smith, on a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Henry John Stephen Smith Reference number: RR/5/199 -
Second referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Arthur Cayley Reference number: RR/5/200 -
Note by Henry John Stephen Smith, on a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Henry John Stephen Smith Reference number: RR/5/201 -
Letter from Arthur Cayley, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On Fermat's theorem of the polygonal numbers. —Second communication' by Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Creator: Arthur Cayley Reference number: RR/5/202
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 5, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1863-1865 Reference number: RR/5
Related Fellows
-
Arthur Cayley
Referee -
George Gabriel Stokes
Recipient -
Jonathan Frederick Pollock
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection