Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper is the second in a series. Suggests the lengthy appendices might be published as a separate paper.

Subject: Zoology and Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1866]

Reference number
RR/5/172
Earliest possible date
25 October 1865
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Flower

View page for William Henry Flower

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Flower, Referee's report by William Henry Flower, on a paper 'On the structure and development of the skull in the ostrich tribe' by William Kitchen Parker, 25 October 1865, RR/5/172, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_172/referees-report-by-william-henry-flower-on-a-paper-on-the-structure-and-development-of-the-skull-in-the-ostrich-tribe-by-william-kitchen-parker, accessed on 05 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_172/referees-report-by-william-henry-flower-on-a-paper-on-the-structure-and-development-of-the-skull-in-the-ostrich-tribe-by-william-kitchen-parker" title="Referee's report by William Henry Flower, on a paper 'On the structure and development of the skull in the ostrich tribe' by William Kitchen Parker" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection