Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by William Sharpey, on a paper 'On the marsupial pouches, mammary glands, and mammary foetus of the Echidna hystrix' by Richard Owen

Reference number: RR/5/165

Date: July 1865

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Zoology and Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1865]

Reference number
RR/5/165
Earliest possible date
July 1865
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Sharpey

View page for William Sharpey

Use this record

Citation

William Sharpey, Referee's report by William Sharpey, on a paper 'On the marsupial pouches, mammary glands, and mammary foetus of the Echidna hystrix' by Richard Owen, July 1865, RR/5/165, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_165/referees-report-by-william-sharpey-on-a-paper-on-the-marsupial-pouches-mammary-glands-and-mammary-foetus-of-the-echidna-hystrix-by-richard-owen, accessed on 19 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_165/referees-report-by-william-sharpey-on-a-paper-on-the-marsupial-pouches-mammary-glands-and-mammary-foetus-of-the-echidna-hystrix-by-richard-owen" title="Referee's report by William Sharpey, on a paper 'On the marsupial pouches, mammary glands, and mammary foetus of the Echidna hystrix' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection