Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Refers to work by Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer, Andreas Wagner and Staberlein [?]. Considers that Owen is a little too biased towards describing the specimen as a bird, rather than as a well-balanced, objective description. Other researchers have not given an opinion, or considered the specimen a 'featherd sautian' on account of other anatomical features, but the present author 'finds everything compatible with the inference that it must have been a "bird of flight"'. The paper appears hurried. Without the microscopical investigations of the bone the paper must be considered incomplete. Criticises the author for not following nomenclature rules in giving the fossil a new name of 'Archaeopteryx macrura, Owen' when the fossil had already been named 'Archeopteryx lithographica, Meyer' in 1861. 'The acquisition of the fossil by purchase, conveys no right to alter the earlier and published name'. Suggests reducing the size of some of the illustrations. Suggests there is no requirement for the life-restoration figure, or the embryological sketchs of modern birds. Notes that John Evans has recently described a skull found in the matix with the fossil, which should be referenced by the author in the finished paper.

Subject: Geology, Zoology and Palaeontology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1863]

Reference number
RR/5/162
Earliest possible date
20 December 1862
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Hugh Falconer

View page for Hugh Falconer

Use this record

Citation

Hugh Falconer, Referee's report by Hugh Falconer, on a paper 'On the Archeopteryx of von Meyer, with a description of the fossil remains of a long-tailed species, from the lithographic stone of Solenhofen' by Richard Owen, 20 December 1862, RR/5/162, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_162/referees-report-by-hugh-falconer-on-a-paper-on-the-archeopteryx-of-von-meyer-with-a-description-of-the-fossil-remains-of-a-long-tailed-species-from-the-lithographic-stone-of-solenhofen-by-richard-owen, accessed on 22 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_162/referees-report-by-hugh-falconer-on-a-paper-on-the-archeopteryx-of-von-meyer-with-a-description-of-the-fossil-remains-of-a-long-tailed-species-from-the-lithographic-stone-of-solenhofen-by-richard-owen" title="Referee's report by Hugh Falconer, on a paper 'On the Archeopteryx of von Meyer, with a description of the fossil remains of a long-tailed species, from the lithographic stone of Solenhofen' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection