Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Thanks George Gabriel Stokes for his report. Discusses the author's theory of polyedra, and hopes the Royal Society will accept it. Wonders what the Royal Academy will do with their medal for next year, 1861. Hopes George Gabriel Stokes has read at least the mathematical portion of the paper published in the Proceedings

Subject: Zoology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1862]

Reference number
RR/5/132
Earliest possible date
24 September 1863
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Letter from Thomas Penyngton Kirkman, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On the theory of the polyedra' by Thomas Penyngton Kirkman, 24 September 1863, RR/5/132, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_132/letter-from-thomas-penyngton-kirkman-to-george-gabriel-stokes-regarding-a-paper-on-the-theory-of-the-polyedra-by-thomas-penyngton-kirkman, accessed on 13 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_132/letter-from-thomas-penyngton-kirkman-to-george-gabriel-stokes-regarding-a-paper-on-the-theory-of-the-polyedra-by-thomas-penyngton-kirkman" title="Letter from Thomas Penyngton Kirkman, to George Gabriel Stokes, regarding a paper 'On the theory of the polyedra' by Thomas Penyngton Kirkman" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection