Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Refers to a preliminary work by the same author ['Description of a new specimen of Glyptodon, recently acquired by the Royal College of Surgeons of England', Proceedings, doi:10.1098/rspl.1862.0071 Vol.12 1863]. Refers to work by Dámaso Antonio Larrañaga, Serres [?], Hermann Burmeister and Richard Owen.

Subject: Geology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1865]

Reference number
RR/5/123
Earliest possible date
02 May 1864
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Hugh Falconer

View page for Hugh Falconer

Use this record

Citation

Hugh Falconer, Referee's report by Hugh Falconer, on a paper 'On the osteology of the genus glyptodon' by Thomas Henry Huxley, 02 May 1864, RR/5/123, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_5_123/referees-report-by-hugh-falconer-on-a-paper-on-the-osteology-of-the-genus-glyptodon-by-thomas-henry-huxley, accessed on 05 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_5_123/referees-report-by-hugh-falconer-on-a-paper-on-the-osteology-of-the-genus-glyptodon-by-thomas-henry-huxley" title="Referee's report by Hugh Falconer, on a paper 'On the osteology of the genus glyptodon' by Thomas Henry Huxley" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection