Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 15 May 1936.

Reference number
RR/59/29
Earliest possible date
May 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Otto Rosenheim

View page for Otto Rosenheim

Use this record

Citation

Otto Rosenheim, Referee's report by Otto Rosenheim, on a paper 'Further observations on the oestrogenic activity of synthetic polycyclic compounds' by James Wilfred Cook, Edward Charles Dodds and W Lawson, May 1936, RR/59/29, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_59_29/referees-report-by-otto-rosenheim-on-a-paper-further-observations-on-the-oestrogenic-activity-of-synthetic-polycyclic-compounds-by-james-wilfred-cook-edward-charles-dodds-and-w-lawson, accessed on 07 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_59_29/referees-report-by-otto-rosenheim-on-a-paper-further-observations-on-the-oestrogenic-activity-of-synthetic-polycyclic-compounds-by-james-wilfred-cook-edward-charles-dodds-and-w-lawson" title="Referee's report by Otto Rosenheim, on a paper 'Further observations on the oestrogenic activity of synthetic polycyclic compounds' by James Wilfred Cook, Edward Charles Dodds and W Lawson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection