Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. One of the remarks about the diamagnetism of graphite made by the author is at odds with previous research carried out by Jones. The author should be made aware of this.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1937].

Endorsed on verso as received 10 November 1936.

Reference number
RR/58/59
Earliest possible date
November 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Nevill Francis Mott

View page for Nevill Francis Mott

Use this record

Citation

Nevill Francis Mott, Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'Magnetic anisotropy and electronic structure of aromatic molecules' by Kathleen Yardley Lonsdale, November 1936, RR/58/59, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_58_59/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-magnetic-anisotropy-and-electronic-structure-of-aromatic-molecules-by-kathleen-yardley-lonsdale, accessed on 13 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_58_59/referees-report-by-nevill-francis-mott-on-a-paper-magnetic-anisotropy-and-electronic-structure-of-aromatic-molecules-by-kathleen-yardley-lonsdale" title="Referee's report by Nevill Francis Mott, on a paper 'Magnetic anisotropy and electronic structure of aromatic molecules' by Kathleen Yardley Lonsdale" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection