Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The calculated value of diamagnetic susceptibility is in better agreement with the observed value than has been obtained before.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1936].

Endorsed on verso as received 27 April 1936.

Reference number
RR/58/4
Earliest possible date
April 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

John Edward Lennard-Jones

View page for John Edward Lennard-Jones

Use this record

Citation

John Edward Lennard-Jones, Referee's report by John Edward Lennard-Jones, on a paper 'Self-consistent field, with exchange, for Cl-' by Douglas Rayner Hartree and W Hartree, April 1936, RR/58/4, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_58_4/referees-report-by-john-edward-lennard-jones-on-a-paper-self-consistent-field-with-exchange-for-cl-by-douglas-rayner-hartree-and-w-hartree, accessed on 30 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_58_4/referees-report-by-john-edward-lennard-jones-on-a-paper-self-consistent-field-with-exchange-for-cl-by-douglas-rayner-hartree-and-w-hartree" title="Referee's report by John Edward Lennard-Jones, on a paper 'Self-consistent field, with exchange, for Cl-' by Douglas Rayner Hartree and W Hartree" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection