Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. 'This is a valuable contribution containing much new matter'.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 30 April 1935.

Reference number
RR/57/45
Earliest possible date
April 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Stephen Goodrich

View page for Edwin Stephen Goodrich

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Stephen Goodrich, Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'The ostracoderm Pteraspis Kner and the relationships of the agnathous vertebrates' by Errol Ivor White, April 1935, RR/57/45, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_57_45/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-the-ostracoderm-pteraspis-kner-and-the-relationships-of-the-agnathous-vertebrates-by-errol-ivor-white, accessed on 28 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_57_45/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-the-ostracoderm-pteraspis-kner-and-the-relationships-of-the-agnathous-vertebrates-by-errol-ivor-white" title="Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'The ostracoderm Pteraspis Kner and the relationships of the agnathous vertebrates' by Errol Ivor White" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection