Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', with modifications, or publication elsewhere as 'the contact with part I is not particularly close'. Suggests further experiments are necessary.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 16 December 1935.

Reference number
RR/57/18
Earliest possible date
December 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Bernard Augustus Keen

View page for Bernard Augustus Keen

Use this record

Citation

Bernard Augustus Keen, Referee's report by Bernard Augustus Keen, on a paper 'Studies on thixotropic gelation - II—The coagulation of clay suspensions' by J L Russell, December 1935, RR/57/18, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_57_18/referees-report-by-bernard-augustus-keen-on-a-paper-studies-on-thixotropic-gelation-iithe-coagulation-of-clay-suspensions-by-j-l-russell, accessed on 03 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_57_18/referees-report-by-bernard-augustus-keen-on-a-paper-studies-on-thixotropic-gelation-iithe-coagulation-of-clay-suspensions-by-j-l-russell" title="Referee's report by Bernard Augustus Keen, on a paper 'Studies on thixotropic gelation - II—The coagulation of clay suspensions' by J L Russell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection