Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Doubts whether the plates are worth the cost of printing.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 5 February 1935.

Reference number
RR/57/17
Earliest possible date
03 February 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Cudmore McCullagh Lewis

View page for William Cudmore McCullagh Lewis

Use this record

Citation

William Cudmore McCullagh Lewis, Referee's report by William Cudmore McCullagh Lewis, on a paper 'Studies on thixotropic gelation - II—The coagulation of clay suspensions' by J L Russell, 03 February 1936, RR/57/17, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_57_17/referees-report-by-william-cudmore-mccullagh-lewis-on-a-paper-studies-on-thixotropic-gelation-iithe-coagulation-of-clay-suspensions-by-j-l-russell, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_57_17/referees-report-by-william-cudmore-mccullagh-lewis-on-a-paper-studies-on-thixotropic-gelation-iithe-coagulation-of-clay-suspensions-by-j-l-russell" title="Referee's report by William Cudmore McCullagh Lewis, on a paper 'Studies on thixotropic gelation - II—The coagulation of clay suspensions' by J L Russell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection