Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Comments on the measurments of the radiation.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 9 March 1936.

Reference number
RR/56/97
Earliest possible date
March 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur William Conway

View page for Arthur William Conway

Use this record

Citation

Arthur William Conway, Referee's report by Arthur William Conway, on a paper 'On the spinless rectilinear motion of a uniformly and rigidly electrified sphere—II' by George Adolphus Schott, March 1936, RR/56/97, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_97/referees-report-by-arthur-william-conway-on-a-paper-on-the-spinless-rectilinear-motion-of-a-uniformly-and-rigidly-electrified-sphereii-by-george-adolphus-schott, accessed on 19 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_97/referees-report-by-arthur-william-conway-on-a-paper-on-the-spinless-rectilinear-motion-of-a-uniformly-and-rigidly-electrified-sphereii-by-george-adolphus-schott" title="Referee's report by Arthur William Conway, on a paper 'On the spinless rectilinear motion of a uniformly and rigidly electrified sphere—II' by George Adolphus Schott" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection