Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

The referee's remarks are on points of no great importance. The difference between the current paper and the previous one are small, but the author has overestimated the accuracy of the first results. Agrees with the author that the wavelengths will be more useful than photographs of ring systems. Refers to work by Derek Ainslie Jackson and H Kuhn.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 14 March 1936.

Reference number
RR/56/43
Earliest possible date
13 March 1936
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Response to referee by Alfred Fowler, on a paper 'Wave- length standards in the first spectrum of krypton' by C V Jackson, 13 March 1936, RR/56/43, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_43/response-to-referee-by-alfred-fowler-on-a-paper-wave-length-standards-in-the-first-spectrum-of-krypton-by-c-v-jackson, accessed on 13 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_43/response-to-referee-by-alfred-fowler-on-a-paper-wave-length-standards-in-the-first-spectrum-of-krypton-by-c-v-jackson" title="Response to referee by Alfred Fowler, on a paper 'Wave- length standards in the first spectrum of krypton' by C V Jackson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection