Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Finds the paper disappointing. The only point of interest is the arrangement for testing of pure ozone. The reference list is lacking in previous investigations, and is only concerned with the chemical processes. Refers to work of Heise, whose work should be referenced.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 5 March 1935.

Reference number
RR/56/4
Earliest possible date
March 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Charles Grant Ledingham

View page for John Charles Grant Ledingham

Use this record

Citation

John Charles Grant Ledingham, Referee's report by John Charles Grant Ledingham, on a paper 'On the effect of pure ozone on bacteria' by R B Haines, March 1935, RR/56/4, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_4/referees-report-by-john-charles-grant-ledingham-on-a-paper-on-the-effect-of-pure-ozone-on-bacteria-by-r-b-haines, accessed on 01 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_4/referees-report-by-john-charles-grant-ledingham-on-a-paper-on-the-effect-of-pure-ozone-on-bacteria-by-r-b-haines" title="Referee's report by John Charles Grant Ledingham, on a paper 'On the effect of pure ozone on bacteria' by R B Haines" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection