Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', if modified. Part one should be shortened, part two omitted or rewritten, and part three published as it stands, with all parts published together as one paper. Provides details for suggested modifications for each part.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 14 August 1935.

Reference number
RR/56/25
Earliest possible date
August 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Stephen Goodrich

View page for Edwin Stephen Goodrich

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Stephen Goodrich, Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'Studies of the epidermal structures of birds' by Anne Hosker, August 1935, RR/56/25, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_25/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-studies-of-the-epidermal-structures-of-birds-by-anne-hosker, accessed on 21 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_25/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-studies-of-the-epidermal-structures-of-birds-by-anne-hosker" title="Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'Studies of the epidermal structures of birds' by Anne Hosker" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection