Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Engineering Sciences

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Still finds the paper unconvincing, despite the omissions. Refers to work of William Lawrence Bragg. Does not understand the meaning of the ratios. States that John Edward Lennard-Jones has seen the paper.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 19 June 1935.

Reference number
RR/56/125
Earliest possible date
June 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Cecil Henry Desch

View page for Cecil Henry Desch

Use this record

Citation

Cecil Henry Desch, Second referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'Numerical relationships in binary metallic systems' by D Stockdale, June 1935, RR/56/125, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_125/second-referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-numerical-relationships-in-binary-metallic-systems-by-d-stockdale, accessed on 12 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_125/second-referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-numerical-relationships-in-binary-metallic-systems-by-d-stockdale" title="Second referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'Numerical relationships in binary metallic systems' by D Stockdale" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection