Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests clarifying some of the experimental method. Comments on some of the areas of interpretation.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 31 July 1935.

Reference number
RR/56/106
Earliest possible date
July 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
5 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Peter Hill

View page for James Peter Hill

Use this record

Citation

James Peter Hill, Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'Studies on the physiology of the maternal placenta in the rat' by Hans Selye and T Mckeown, July 1935, RR/56/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56_106/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-physiology-of-the-maternal-placenta-in-the-rat-by-hans-selye-and-t-mckeown, accessed on 18 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56_106/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-physiology-of-the-maternal-placenta-in-the-rat-by-hans-selye-and-t-mckeown" title="Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'Studies on the physiology of the maternal placenta in the rat' by Hans Selye and T Mckeown" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection