Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

The Royal Society: Science in the Making

Referees' reports: volume 56, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication

Reference number: RR/56

Date: 1935

Description

Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review in 1935.

Notable referees and authors include Stanley George Hooker, Joseph Proudman and Robert John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh.

When report is on a standardised form (D), the questions are:
1. Whether or not the paper should be read before the Society
2. Whether the paper should or should not be published by the Society
3. Whether, in the former case, it should be published in the 'Philosophical Transactions' or 'Proceedings'
4. Whether it should be published in full or only in part or whether any material modifications are necessary
5. Which illustrations, if any, accompanying the paper should be reproduced
General remarks

Reference number
RR/56
Earliest possible date
1935
Physical description
Loose paper in folders
Page extent
One box comprising 131 reports
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Use this record

IIIF manifest

View​ IIIF ​ manifest Opens in new tab

Open in Mirador viewer Opens in new tab

Export this record

Download PDF Opens in new tab

Citation

Referees' reports: volume 56, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1935, RR/56, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56/referees-reports-volume-56-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_56/referees-reports-volume-56-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_56/referees-reports-volume-56-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 56, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Hierarchy

This volume contains 131 manuscripts:

See all 131 manuscripts

This item is part of:

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection