Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper is long but there seems to be no way of abbreviating it. It is difficult to understand, so it could be amended. The main problem is understanding the equations.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1936].

Endorsed on verso as received 7 August 1935.

Reference number
RR/55/81
Earliest possible date
August 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
8 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Arthur Milne

View page for Edward Arthur Milne

Use this record

Citation

Edward Arthur Milne, Referee's report by Edward Arthur Milne, on a paper 'Time-lag in a control system' by A Callender, Douglas Rayner Hartree and A Porter, August 1935, RR/55/81, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_55_81/referees-report-by-edward-arthur-milne-on-a-paper-time-lag-in-a-control-system-by-a-callender-douglas-rayner-hartree-and-a-porter, accessed on 08 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_55_81/referees-report-by-edward-arthur-milne-on-a-paper-time-lag-in-a-control-system-by-a-callender-douglas-rayner-hartree-and-a-porter" title="Referee's report by Edward Arthur Milne, on a paper 'Time-lag in a control system' by A Callender, Douglas Rayner Hartree and A Porter" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection