Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Not recommended for publication. It is 'rather diffuse' and he cannot make out the point that he is saying. The paper isn't misleading but vague on the whole.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 May 1935.

Reference number
RR/55/46
Earliest possible date
20 May 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Ronald Aylmer Fisher

View page for Ronald Aylmer Fisher

Use this record

Citation

Ronald Aylmer Fisher, Referee's report by Ronald Aylmer Fisher, on a paper 'A study by statistical methods of the distribution of species in grassland associations' by Geoffrey Emett Blackman, 20 May 1935, RR/55/46, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_55_46/referees-report-by-ronald-aylmer-fisher-on-a-paper-a-study-by-statistical-methods-of-the-distribution-of-species-in-grassland-associations-by-geoffrey-emett-blackman, accessed on 08 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_55_46/referees-report-by-ronald-aylmer-fisher-on-a-paper-a-study-by-statistical-methods-of-the-distribution-of-species-in-grassland-associations-by-geoffrey-emett-blackman" title="Referee's report by Ronald Aylmer Fisher, on a paper 'A study by statistical methods of the distribution of species in grassland associations' by Geoffrey Emett Blackman" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection